#Change11 :: Commentary on Comments
Commenting in MOOCS
As I experiment with my comment scraping program I’m becoming more aware of the important role that MOOC participants play in commenting on each others blogs. As Mira comments (in a comment) “Some of my most memorable learning experiences have been reading blog comments . . .” In general, I find that there is usually something of interest in any comment stream – even on YouTube, and with some ‘reading between the lines’, online comments can provide a far better cross-section of opinion, informed or otherwise, than the typical ‘Letters to the Editor’ in a newspaper.
Sometimes lengthy comment strings blow up in no time at all before tailing off a few days later. (The recent thread following Jenny’s excellent post on The philosophy of MOOCs is a good example.) Such comment strings may lack narrative but the best examples can be highly engaging with overt signs of real learning. On one level they remind me of brief and informal staff room discussions over a quick coffee where participants come and go at will, questioning and interacting with those who appear to know what they are talking about but also talking over each other, mis-hearing and misunderstanding – all (usually!) in an atmosphere of tolerance and mutual respect. But the comment streams in a MOOC offer rather more than this. There is opportunity to put some real thought into what is posted and, something I suspect that many bloggers and commenters forget, the record of their words of wisdom remains for posterity. Given the interest engendered by these very first MOOCs, the associated blogs and comments could be picked over for many years to come!
One thing that strikes me about connectivist MOOCs such as Change11, is the number of blog postings that attract no comments at all. It is often not obvious why this should be so but when it is, isn’t there all the more reason for other participants, inspired by the connectivist spirit, to make a connection? I see that a large number of registered Change11 bloggers have never posted in the New Year and I wonder if this reflects a perceived lack of interest in their posts? On the other hand, some bloggers rarely reply to comments on their blogs, a practice that can hardly strengthen connections. Of course participants are free do as they like in a MOOC and I don’t mean to imply disapproval (as a semi-lurker, I’d be the ‘pot calling the kettle black’). Many, or even most MOOCers seem to get more out of the free-wheeling MOOC ethos than strict adherence to connectivist principles might suggest: more a case of (to misquote T S Eliot on cats ):
For they will do
As they do do
And there’s no doing anything about it!
Returning to the Comment Scraper, Jaap, John and Brainysmurf kindly gave me permission for their blog comments to be scraped and published on an experimental basis. This has been done and several program changes have been tested. I’m now in a position to try out the Scraper on a larger collection of blogs and this raises issues that I’ve mentioned before on the propriety of publishing other people’s material. It is not practical for me to contact the authors of many blogs individually so I am proposing to continue scraping blogs authored by the authors above while adding more blogs in an abbreviated style along the following lines:
#Change11 :: A ‘Comment Scraper’ for Aggregating Blog Posts with Comments in a MOOC by gbl55 on 04 Feb 2012
Trying to keep track of what’s going on in a MOOC where discussion is distributed over nu..
Comments:[04 Feb 2012] [ 04 Feb 2012][25 Feb 2012][25 Feb 2012][29 Feb 2012]
In this form, the content appearing from a blog is less than what is already available via the Daily and only the dates of comments are given. As the Comment Scraper is likely to be more useful in the full form, further permissions for this would be very welcome. Equally, any request by a blog author to refrain from scraping their blog in any way will be respected. At present I am focusing on Change11 WordPress and Blogger blogs but hope to look at other feeds and MOOCs in due course.
If the Scraper proves to be useful in a MOOC context I will eventually make it available (I’m no expert programmer and have only gone so far in learning Python.) I should point out that I have absolutely no interest in exploiting the program for any other purpose.
 Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats by T S Eliot.
Checking out my Eliot misquotation above I also came across his poem on ‘The Naming of Cats’ and suddenly realised that he had some very important things to say about MOOCs:
The Naming of MOOCs (apologies to T S Eliot)
The Naming of MOOCs is a difficult matter,
It isn’t just one of your holiday games
You may think at first I’m as mad as a hatter
When I tell you, a MOOC must have THREE DIFFERENT NAMES.
First of all, there’s the name that you find in The Daily,
Such as Eddy, Udastard, DS Something or Change,
All brief and hashtagable everyday names.
But I tell you, a MOOC needs a name that’s particular,
A name that’s peculiar, and more dignified,
Else, how can she grow knowledge, her nodes perpendicular,
spreading connections with undisguised pride?
But above and beyond there’s still one name left over,
And that is the name that you never will guess
The name no researcher will ever discover–
But THE MOOC HERSELF KNOWS, and will never confess.
When you notice a MOOC in profound meditation,
The reason, I tell you, is always the same:
Her nodes are engaged in a rapt contemplation
Of the thought, of the thought, of the thought of her name:
Her ineffable effable
Deep and inscrutable singular Name.