Connection not Content

A Blog for MOOCs and Other Animals

C or X MOOCs ? – Make Way for the Super-MOOC !

with 11 comments

While basic topics such as the validity of various learning theories can be joyfully debated until the cows come home in a connectivist cMOOC, this seems less appropriate for the ‘hard’ sciences, such as physics and chemistry, where a knowledge of fundamental procedures and processes is essential for even basic comprehension, let alone expertise. Here, facts are, … well facts, and becoming familiar with them by slogging through the mathematics and other donkey work is likely to be more productive than protracted debate. Now, having joined an xMOOC in the shape of Coursera’s Quantum Computing Course, I am finding out for myself. This is not a course for beginners but I do at least have some of the required background.

Calling a cMOOC a ‘course’ has always struck me as a misnomer – but not so for a Coursera xMOOC. The course I’m on has a well-defined curriculum of 8 week duration ending with a 3 hour timed examination. New course content in the form of notes and several shortish videos are released every week and there are weekly assignments to be tackled. The assignments can be submitted and auto-marked – frustratingly, only correct answers seem to generate feedback! The professor  in the videos does a good job but is very much ‘sage on the stage’. His explanations are competent and helpful although sometimes the course notes do not match in very well with the videos. I have yet to see the prof descend from the stage and interact directly with learners in the discussion forums. A TA deals with admin matters there (typos in the notes or gremlins in the marking system etc) but evidently not with queries on course content. Queries of this type, at all levels of difficulty, are left to other participants but fortunately there are several individuals (not me!) who appear well-qualified to help out. They devote considerable time and energy to providing personalised assistance and are able to lead informed discussion. This ‘unofficial’ bonus is clearly appreciated by other participants and contrasts with the relentless one-way transfer of content from sage to student.

Receiving the “statement of accomplishment” depends on overall performance on 7 assignments plus the final exam and there is a complicated marking scheme involving penalties for late submissions of the assignments. No doubt carefully crafted to suit the diverse circumstances of participants, its fairness seems doomed to endless debate in the forums! This obsession with the mechanics of assessment and the tacit assumption that expertise at this level can be properly measured by not much more than multiple-choice questions is disconcerting. I conclude that there’s nothing like a bit of old-fashioned xMOOC behaviourist pedagogy for learning the basics and, like many others on the course, I’ve certainly found the experience interesting and enjoyable – as far as it goes. It may not go much further for me though as real life intervenes and keeping up the pace takes an ever-increasing amount of time. I have no particular interest in ‘passing’ the course but yet part of me is spurred on by the fear of ‘failure’ that still dogs the survivors of 20th century formal education (along with ‘exam dreams’!) Another part of me just wants time to study some of the more interesting course topics in detail before moving on. That’s me – but the ‘Massive’ in MOOC delivers a wide diversity of other participants with other learning objectives who want something else. This of course is not usually the case for the traditional college courses on which Coursera and other xMOOCs appear to be based.

It seems to me that a MOOC has the potential to provide learners with a degree of choice way over and above what is possible in traditional courses. Imagine as an ideal, some sort of multi-layered, many-pathed super-MOOC offering a multitude of different modes of participation. Sub-courses on prerequisite topics are available on tap and the path traversed by different learners can, with or without advice, take many different possible routes through copious notes, videos, interactive quizzes and so on depending on the background and objectives of individual learners – even 3 hour timed exams to be taken if you must! Human assistance is available for the asking – perhaps via scores of previous participants who have already demonstrated their usefulness and are rewarded somehow for their assistance. The financial implications are beyond me but could such a super-MOOC not evolve relatively inexpensively from small beginnings by developing content and infrastructure over several iterations as ever-increasing numbers of participation modes are catered for?

Returning to the humble MOOC of today – this is a testing time as the altruism and openess that gave birth to the original cMOOCs is challenged by the new style xMOOCs with their focus on existing Higher Education practices and ways and means of ‘monetising’.  I can only hope that the aspirations (below), expressed almost half a century ago, will not be lost in the process!

Higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education.

Article 13: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16th December 1966

Advertisements

Written by Gordon Lockhart

August 10, 2012 at 5:10 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

11 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Interesting… helps me focus some of my own thoughts on moocness, typology of moocs, whatever. I am in a Coursera too, humanities because I want to see how they work there (crowdsourcing or peer grading writing assignments). Besides, readings, lectures and conversations are very good. The course is Fantasy and Science Fiction (The Human Mind, our Modern World). I find myself thinking about moocs as down the rabbit hole or through the looking glass ~ better that than vampires and FrankenMoocs.

    There are glitches to be sure, but at least these are getting to the business of being about something besides themselves. Like you I see potential.

    Students/participants (even ones who never heard of c-mooc) are creating their own distributed networks, to be sure more tolerated than encouraged but happening. They are also offering copious unasked for feedback on forums, blogs, networks, etc that will be hard to ignore.

    Infinite Hotel reminds me of Hotel California as well: “you can check out any time but you can never leave.”

    VanessaVaile

    August 12, 2012 at 3:25 pm

    • Thanks Vanessa – and good to see you are on a Coursera xMOOC too – be sure to blog sometime about your experiences! I always wondered how MOOCs could deal with essay writing type assignments – I’ve seen both good and bad reports recently on Coursera’s peer assessment. I have some admiration for the profs doing these MOOCs, openly subjecting their academic standards to scrutiny by the masses – including some very sharp and genned-up participants!

      Like the original railway cars that were modelled on stagecoaches – cos that’s how travel was done before – the same thinking seems to be influencing xMOOCs – that’s how learning is done now so stay with it – it’s familiar to the punters and more likely to be worth paying for following the loss leaders!
      Gordon

      gbl55

      August 12, 2012 at 8:53 pm

      • peer grading is still rocky – a source of friction too. The “genned up” are cranky about accepting non-academic others as peers, comparing it to being graded by gym teachers. This attitude rubs the some ~ including superbly educated and well read professionals ~ the wrong way,. The scenario is not unlike children on a playground.

        Another problem is trying to keep most discussion for such a large group walled in. No daily or list of blog feeds to subscribe to, no twitter stream to follow, etc. ~ let alone a selection of them to choose from.

        That said, I am glad they are doing and am encouraging friends, colleagues, high school teachers, ESL instructors and learners, local general public to check out the course list.

        VanessaVaile

        August 14, 2012 at 8:22 pm

  2. […] While basic topics such as the validity of various learning theories can be joyfully debated until the cows come home in a connectivist cMOOC, this seems less appropriate for the ‘hard’…  […]

  3. […] as in Coursera and Udacity.  Instructivism is the key to learning. Teacher and teaching-centered. Instructor sage on the stage is the norm, and is therefore expected.  Great teaching determines effective learning.  Assessment […]

  4. […] While basic topics such as the validity of various learning theories can be joyfully debated until the cows come home in a connectivist cMOOC, this seems less appropriate for the ‘hard’…  […]

  5. […] Dominic came up his own understanding of the “features” of a MOOC. See also Gordon Lockhart’s Super-MOOC, A MOOC by Another Name and a brilliant post by Doug Holton, where he makes many insightful […]

  6. […] While basic topics such as the validity of various learning theories can be joyfully debated until the cows come home in a connectivist cMOOC, this seems less appropriate for the ‘hard’…  […]

  7. […] While basic topics such as the validity of various learning theories can be joyfully debated until the cows come home in a connectivist cMOOC, this seems less appropriate for the ‘hard’…  […]

  8. […] C or X MOOCs ? – Make Way for the Super-MOOC ! While basic topics such as the validity of various learning theories can be joyfully debated until the cows come home in a connectivist c… Share […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: